|

The
Breed Ban of the GSD in Australia
1928 - 1972
An
article by W.D CROWLEY -
reprinted from the Second Century News October 1968.
The
journal of the Victorian Poultry & Kennel Club - October, 1968
edition: For almost 40 years now the importation of German Shepherd dogs
to Australia has been forbidden.
So
long has this futile embargo been in operation that it has come to be
accepted by most citizens, without questioning the basis for it.
This
unjustified discrimination against such a noble animal should be removed
and, no doubt quickly would be if the true position were brought home to a
sufficient number of responsible people. Unless some positive programe is
undertaken, we could drift along with the present embargo for another one
or two decades. However, as our mineral resources and secondary industries
develop sheep and cattle owners will have less influence on such
discriminatory legislation, giving definite hope.
The
ban was introduced for one purpose - "To prevent the German Shepherd
going wild and mating with the Dingo, producing a wild dog capable of
killing sheep". So wide spread has this panic thinking become that,
in various parts of the so-called free country, legislation operates to
entirely prohibit German Shepherds unless they have been sterilized
(Castrated) and thus rendered incapable of reproduction. The peculiar part
of all this is that over a 40 year trial period, there is not one title of
evidence that German Shepherd dogs have crossed with the Dingo. this
becomes even stranger when one appreciates that for much of these four
decades the German Shepherd has been one of the strongest breeds of dogs
numerically in Australia. Evidence is available to support the claim that
certain other fairly large breeds of dogs have crossed with the Dingo. In
North - Eastern Victoria large dogs claimed to be Dingo-Husky
crosses have been shot. One whose picture I have seen is said
to be 8 feet from nose to tail to tip of tail.
All
dog clubs, dog fanciers and controlling bodies should ban together to
remove this illogical useless ban. Concerted action based on the facts of
the matter should soon gain wide support. Let us first look at the animal
in question:
Who
would deny that he is one of the most majestic, intelligent, faithful and
brave canines in the world? How many times do we read of his efforts to
protect his owner and family? How often do we go to a Show or obedience
demonstration and see him well in the fore? As a guard dog for the armed
services or vital section of world police forces he is unsurpassed.
Although importations after a forty year ban would improve him, fanciers
in Australia must be commended for their efforts to continually breed such
fine specimens under adverse conditions. Despite import restrictions and
high permit fees he has retained his immense popularity against all
challengers.
Sheep
and cattlemen all over Australia (indeed the world) depend on importations
to improve their stock. In the thoroughbred horse field this principle is
also accepted without challengers. It is then strange indeed to see these
livestock breeders opposing the importation of German Shepherd sires
certain to improve their stock. Again opponents claim that if the dogs
were imported in large numbers it would drop in price, become everybody's
property and strays would become a menace.
This
objection is about as valid as the others. In Australia today we have
probably had more imports in Pekinese, Daschunds and Boxers than other
breeds. Let us examine the effect:-
1.
These importations have unquestionably improved the breeds, both
temperamentally and physically
2.
The costs of the importations and the Sires fees have raised the price of
puppies.
3.
Irresponsible owners are disinclined to buy puppies at this price, but
those who do certainly prevent them straying.
4.
The number of importations has no effect on the numerical strength of the
breed. Each breed has its fling of popularity and taper off to a solid
permanent figure.
Already,
there are ample facts available to clearly demonstrate the absurdity of
this ban and to demand its immediate removal. However, if further
assurances are necessary, these could be readily available. No great
problem would be involved in having the various Australian controlling
bodies and dog Clubs guaranteeing one or all of the following points:
a.
That the German Shepherd dog population of Australia be restricted to the
figure existing at the 1st January 1969.
b.
That a certain quota of puppies (for example the 1967 figure) only will be
bred in any one year.
c.
That, as in Germany, litters will be registered only from bitches mated to
approved sires.
d.
That puppies will be sold not below a certain fixed price.
e.
That only an agreed number of dogs or bitches would be imported into
Australia in any one year.
These
and other regulations or conditions would lead to an improvement in the
breed, prevent any sharp increase in numbers (although this is obviously
unnecessary) and ensure as far as possible that the dog would not fall
into the hands of indiscriminate breeders.
Finally,
let all dog lovers, dog clubs and interested people put their shoulders to
the wheel to effect the long overdue removal of this unjustified and harsh
restriction. We believe this is a senseless ban. Let us get to work to
prove it. The opposition no doubt believes it is justified so let us force
their arguments out into the open.
_________________________

The Road Back, 1972
saw the lifting of the GSD import
ban
The lifting of the import ban:
reproduced from "A
condensed History of the German Shepherd Dog in Australia - 1929 - 1990"
Although numerous individuals had tried to have the import ban lifted in
both the pre- and post-World War II eras, the authorities remained firmly
opposed.
Interestingly though, a small change to the import rules was made on the
21st June, 1955, which allowed "desexed Alsation Dogs" to be imported into
Australia. Another interesting twist was that in 1962 the Customs Service
agreed to the desexing requirements being released for Australian-bred
German Shepherd Dogs returning home, after having proven that they had
been originally exported.
There seems little doubt that the
establishment of the
German Shepherd Dog Council of Australia
in 1960 and the subsequent staging of the 1st National Show in
Sydney in 1967, provided the background to which enthusiasts could be
motivated to mount a concerted campaign to have the Import Ban lifted.
From
the records available, there seems little doubt that the German Shepherd
Dog Club of Victoria led the way. The
GSDCV had tried two or three times
in the early and mid 1960's to generate support for such a campaign but,
for whatever reason, such efforts failed. During the late 1960's, the late
John Fletcher succeeded in mobilising and coordinating all sections
of the GSDCV to an unprecedented level of support. His efforts, although
at times abrasive and emotive, captured the imagination of all and with
the assistance of a paid Public Relations organization resulted in in the
German Shepherd Dog cause gaining exposure on a scale never previously
thought possible.
The fundraising efforts of the GSDCV during these times was extraordinary.
It is fair to say that the GSDCV led the way and quickly gained
support from other states, principally New South Wales and South
Australia.
It
is interesting to note, that the then President of the Graziers Federal
Council, Dr Locke, resided in Melbourne, as did the then Minister for
Customs and Excise, Mr Don Chipp. Indeed, the GSDCV spent considerable
time and effort in exposing the Minister to all facets of the German
Shepherd Dog via the activities of the Club.
Consequently, the efforts of the German Shepherd Dog Club and zealous
individuals from all over Australia, brought to the attention of the
politicians, bureaucrats generally and particular department officers that
the import ban was based on false, illogical and emotive grounds and
was thus totally discriminatory. Unfortunately, little of this
material is currently available. The following report (nb:
please read
"A condensed History of the German Shepherd Dog in Australia - 1929 -
1990" for this
information) from the GSDCV is reprinted as
evidence of the type of activity being promoted. Also, the GSDCA itself
was active as evidenced by the following letters (nb:
please read
"A condensed History of the German Shepherd Dog in Australia - 1929 -
1990" for this
information) which outline a possible legal solution to the
problem.
However, politics being what it is, the then Minister for Customs and
Excise, Mr Don Chipp, in addition to the forceful moral support mentioned
above, required a sound, logical and scientific evaluation of the benefits
of introducing new German Shepherd Dog blood into the country. For various
reasons, this report was required to be produced in its entirety in nine
days, to enable the Minister to have it analysed and processed through
various government departments, as well as the Graziers Council, the
Liberal and National parties and finally the Federal Cabinet, for approval
prior to Parliament being dissolved for the historic 1972 Federal
election.
|

GSD bitch circa
1929 |

A GSD bitch current |

A GSD dog circa 1929 |

A GSD male
current |
top
|